Role of Derivatives or Securitization in Iceland’s Crisis 2008 (ASSIGNMENT SOLVED)

Iceland's  crisis  that  set  in  after  the  dynamite  breakdown  of  the  nation's  banking  framework  in October 2008 was surely a profound and troublesome crisis. It came in the wake of a build-up of what has been  portrayed  as  the  biggest  bubble  economy  in  the history,  in  connection  to  the  size  of  the  national economy.
The money related breakdown was appropriately likewise of chronicled extents, given the extent of the three primary banks that were at the middle of the entire adventure. The fall of money markets file from its stature was more extreme and quicker than the breakdown on Wall Street in 1929-32 and the obligation collection related to the air pocket was outstandingly vast (ÓLAFSSON, 2011).
Figure 1: ICELAND’s GDP 2006-2012
Source: (Trading Economics, 2015)

Figure 1 shows a major decrease in Iceland’s GDP started in 2008. Iceland's 2007 GDP was 1.293 trillion krónur (€8.5 billion). In 2008, each of the three of the nation's significant banks collapsed in taking after their troubles in refinancing their short-term debt and a run on deposits in the United Kingdom. At more than 75% of its GDP, Iceland's banking breakdown is the biggest endured by any nation in monetary history in respect to the span of its economy.
In late September 2008, it was declared that the Glitnir bank would be nationalized. Right away from that point, Landsbanki and Glitnir were given over to beneficiaries named by the Icelandic Financial Supervisory Authority took after promptly via Iceland's biggest bank, Kaupthing (Yahoo Finance, 2015).   Iceland's external debt was 9.553 trillion Icelandic krónur (€50 billion) in mid-2008, more than 80% of which was held by the saving accounts segment. The advantages of the three banks taken under the control of the FME totalled 14.437 trillion krónur toward the end of the second quarter 2008, just about 10 times the GDP of the of their country.
The crisis was in the meantime a banking crisis, a currency crisis (the estimation of the Icelandic Krona descended by around half of its value), a financial subsidence and a crisis of legislative issues and societal trust. So it was an intense setback for the economy and society. In the period from 1995 and up to the breakdown neoliberal strategy accentuation had been dominating in Iceland, with becoming stronger amid the 2000s. This included an extremely solid trust in the force of business sectors, including financial markets, to self-manage their operations and convey development. A  part  of  the  winning  ethos  was  a  solid  measurement  of  laissez  faire  and  the  private  division  was progressively  seen  as  having  points of interest  over  the  open  segment  as  a  supplier  and  guardian  of administrations  and  to  some  degree  administration. Tax cuts, privatization and business intensity got to be need objectives. These were rather compelling advancements for a Nordic welfare state. Iceland's  entrance  into  the  European  Economic  Area  Zone  (EEA)  in  1995  presented  the  four opportunities of the European Union into the Icelandic political economy, with full opportunity for the stream of capital crosswise over outskirts being the most novel and considerable viewpoint. That was a vital change of political economy environment. The  privatization  of  the  fundamental  state  banks,  which  was begun  in  1998,  demonstrated  to  be  a  major  turning  point  in  terms  of  budgetary  operations in  Iceland. At the point when the banks were completely privatized, toward the start of 2003, the new managers transformed them on the spot into forceful venture banks. They incredibly expanded their support in utilized mergers  and  acquisitions,  first  inside  Iceland  however then  to  a  more prominent  degree  in  the  neighbouring nations. Outer  obligation  raised  and  unreasonable  hazard  conduct  got to be  prevalent  in  the  Icelandic monetary  and  business  environment,  driven  by  the  journey  for  aggregation  of  resources,  benefits  and rewards  (PIC, 2010). With  the  simple  stream  of  obtained  remote  capital,  at  low  interest  rates,  the  economy  had  sufficient assets  for  fast  development,  which  soon  transformed  into  an  intemperate  hypothesis  bubble  (Kalele, 2011). Already by end of 2004 Iceland had turned into the  world's  most  vigorously  obligated  economy,  measured  as  gross  outer  obligation  in  %  of  GDP. Prior to the breakdown of the banks in October 2008 the outside obligation had developed to around eight times the span of the nation's GDP, a high-chance circumstance and completely unsustainable once the development was backed off (ÓLAFSSON S. , 2008). IMF  and  others  have  guaranteed  that  Iceland's monetary  crisis  will be  the  most  excessive  one  in  history,  in connection  to  GDP  (IMF, 2011). Besides,  if  the  collapse of  the  three  business  banks  were taken  as  one  element  the  banks  would be considered as the  third  biggest  bankruptcy  in  the  US  history  of bankruptcies. Given  that  Iceland  has  a  populace  of  just  0.1%  of  the  US  populace  the relative size of the breakdown is obviously tremendous (Halldoersson & Zoega, 2010). Hence, identifying roles of various economic indicators (i.e. stock market, derivatives, commodities, and currency exchange rate etc.) is essential to save economies from such type of crisis in future. In this study, we are going to evaluate role of derivatives in Icelandic Financial crisis.
Risk of Derivatives
A derivative is a financial contract "an arrangement" used to guarantee or anticipate the benefit of something. One individual is a derivative purchaser and one individual is a derivative seller (Management Study Guide, 2015). Normally a financial organization, in the same way as a stock hedging or a bank, goes into a derivative contract with another financial establishment. Derivative purchasers pays a month to month charge to the derivative seller for a set measure of time. For instance, let's say a pension fund is invested into home loan upheld securities as a venture for its resigned people. It doesn't need its beneficiaries to lose cash, so it pays the bank or hedge fund $500 a month for 9 months to verify that the home loan sponsored security doesn't lose esteem. On the off chance that the home loan upheld securities lose esteem, the derivative seller consents to pay the benefits reserve $250,000. This sort of derivative is known as a credit default swap.
Additionally, a few banks, multifaceted investments and people wager on a stock's defeat. They purchase an agreement to short a stock. Also, a monthly expense is paid to a derivative dealer for a set measure of time. For instance, if an individual accepts that gold will go underneath $1,600 an ounce in six months’ time, he or she will purchase a derivative contract making a wager with someone else, bank, or fence stock investments. The purchaser pays the dealer $4,200 a month and consents to pay it for six months with trusts that gold will go underneath $1,600 an ounce. Also, the dealer consents to that and guarantees that he will pay the purchaser $300,000 if the cost of gold goes underneath $1,600 an ounce. Unmistakably, the dealer doesn't accept that the cost of gold will fall beneath $1,600 an ounce. At times, the merchant gathers the $4,200 a month and doesn't even have the $300,000 in the occasion the gold value falls! That is known as naked short selling which causes massive banking losses.
Derivatives Exchanged during 2007-08 Icelandic’s Financial Emergency
Some derivative instruments were exchanged on the capital business sector amid the 2007-2008 financial emergency Iceland. These incorporate resource sponsored securities, mortgaged supported securities, collaterized obligation commitments, credit default swaps, forward, futures and options. Resource supported securities are the most fundamental manifestations of financial derivatives which give the spine to a significant part of the complex derivative instruments (Yahoo Finance, 2013). A benefit sponsored security alludes to any kind of obligation security which is supported by a pool of advantages, their cash flow producing capacity. A home loan supported security is a benefit sponsored security whose money streams are upheld by the important and premium instalments of an arrangement of home loan credits.
Derivatives brokers have additionally created collateralized obligation commitments through which a financial foundation consolidates resources of different sorts (for instance, prime contracts with subprime ones) (Yahoo Finance, 2013). The bundled obligation is then sold to an exceptional reason vehicle, generally enrolled seaward in a low impose purview. The new element then issues its own particular value or bonds to exchange the obligation to different financial specialists, cutting it up into distinctive tranches with diverse danger appraisals utilizing complex scientific models (Wilks, 2008). In a credit default swap bargain, the purchaser makes occasional instalments to the merchant in return for the privilege to a result if there is a default or credit compose down in admiration of a home loan or other obligation securities they hold (Wilks, 2008). CDSs are basically credit derivatives where the hidden resource is an advance, contract or some other type of credit. Credit derivatives are financial contracts that permit the exchange of credit danger starting with one business member then onto the next, possibly encouraging more noteworthy productivity in the valuing and dissemination of credit danger among financial business sector members (Bomfim, 2001). A forward is an agreement whereby two gatherings consent to trade the fundamental resource at a foreordained point in time later on at settled value (European Commission, 2009). Thusly, the purchaser concurs today to purchase a certain advantage later on and the merchant consents to convey that benefit by then. Fates are institutionalized advances exchanged on-trade. An alternative is an agreement that gives the purchaser the privilege, yet not the commitment, to purchase (call) or offer (put) the fundamental resource at or inside a certain point in time in the fates at a foreordained value (strike cost) against the instalment of a premium, which speak to the greatest misfortune for the purchaser of a choice (European Commission, 2009).
Securitization in Icelandic Financial Crisis
Understanding what happened, how and why the Icelandic financial emergency came to fruition is vital for determining what part derivative instruments played in that crisis. Since 1974, 3 bank crisis had happened in Iceland, each played it significant role and each shared something in common: a time of extraordinary financial liberalization and flourishing that went before the crisis (Reavis, 2009). On account of this, (Reavis, 2009) states that financial emergencies may be an unavoidable part of cutting edge private enterprise, an outcome of the co-operations between hardwired human conduct and the liberated capacity to improve, contend and evolve. The financial framework got to be so crowded' as far as the strange measures of capital conveyed in every corner of each investable business that the general liquidity of those businesses declined radically. The Icelandic financial emergency came about because of a course of disappointments, at first activated by the verifiably unanticipated profundity of the fall in lodging costs. Numerous contend that the financial emergency that started in August 2007 was a ―systemic occasion, in which the keeping money area got to be indebted, as in it couldn't pay off its debt (Gorton & & Metrick, 2010). Some economist accepted that the 2007-2008 financial emergency in Iceland was brought on by intense elites (i.e. Banking oligarchy) that overextended in great times and went for broke by making ever-bigger bets, with the understood sponsorship of the administration, until the inexorable breakdown (Reavis, 2009).
Figure 2: Iceland Housing Price Index vs. Disposible Personal Income 2001 - 2012
Source: (Trading Economics, 2015)
Commercial/business banks of Iceland along these lines gave credits at sub-prime (rate well over the reference premium rate charged by the banks) to the regular individuals for lodging purposes. These advances were moved down against the houses - subprime home loan credits. Subprime home loans are home loan advances issued to people who don't meet the standard prerequisites for routine home loans. This may be because of poor record as a consumer, insecure pay history, or some other element influencing the income creating capacity of the individual (Qudrat, 2009). Preceding the financial emergency, banks made home loan advances accessible to try and dangerous borrowers and charged high premium rates to counterbalance misfortunes. Notwithstanding, when home costs quit admiring, these borrowers couldn't refinance; hence, they defaulted (Schwarcz, 2009). In 2006 the normal home cost about four times what the normal family made. Despite the fact that family unit earnings stayed level amid that time (figure 2) more individuals had the capacity bear the cost of houses because of a facilitating of loaning necessities (Reavis, 2009).
By 2007 it got to be obvious that the lodging air pocket was beginning to blast and individuals started defaulting on their home loans, sending a gradually expanding influence through the financial framework (Reavis, 2009). (Schwarcz, 2009) found that these defaults have brought on significant measures of low speculation evaluation home loan upheld securities to default and AAA-appraised securities to be downsized.
Discussion of facts
Derivatives played an important role in Icelandic financial crisis. The total notional value, or face value, of the global derivatives market when the housing bubble popped in 2007 stood at around $500 trillion (Forbes, 2013). This area talks about a few truths in relations to the 2007-2008 financial crisis. It concentrates on the parts played by derivative instruments in the financial crisis.
Derivatives didn't result in the financial emergency however they accelerated it once the subprime home loan fallen, due to the interlinked ventures (Global Issues, 2008). There were two parts that derivative instruments played in the Icelandic financial crisis (Turner, 2009). The principal is shared funds (which are not banks), taking purchaser ventures which are fluid in nature (prompt or short reclamation) and putting resources into long haul securities. The second is mutual funds that are directed as resource administrators, however the real lawful trust is normally enrolled seaward and not subject to reasonable regulation. Derivatives permitted cash to stream all the more openly from the individuals who had it to the individuals who required it. Additionally, offering assurance against the danger of financial misfortune, they offered ―fair comes back to high-dollar speculators willing to go out on a limb.
For banks that advanced out several billions of dollars, derivatives, hypothetically, helped relieve chance by securing them in the event that advances were defaulted. The worldwide derivatives business sector extended just about half amid 2007, with CDS market and options markets developing exponentially (see figure 3). The remarkable estimation of CDS contracts surged to more than five times the exceptional central of worldwide corporate securities before the end of 2007 (Yahoo Finance, 2012), whilst the extraordinary estimation of merchandise derivatives ascended from around US$400 billion in 1998 to US$9 trillion toward the end of 2007. Options markets have likewise become firmly. Case in point, the extraordinary essential of interest rate options had expanded from US$8 trillion in 1998 to US$57 trillion in 2007 (Jenkinson, Penalver, & Vause, 2008).
Figure 3: Outstanding notional amounts of derivatives
Source: (Jenkinson, Penalver, & Vause, 2008)
The dangers inalienable in Credit Default Swaps (CDS) and different sorts of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives assumed pivotal part in the Icelandic financial crisis (European Commission, 2009). OTC markets were genuinely light administrative treatment markers for expert financial specialists, which were not specifically available to the overall population. These qualities ended up being the bedrock of the OTC business sector amid the financial crisis and may have, truant brief and powerful mediation from governments, destroyed devastation to the financial framework.
EU governments have turned to derivatives and securitization as a method for expelling obligation from general society accounts and of raising capital without expanding their authority obligation load (Wilks, 2008). Annuity instalments for previous state representatives, Export Credit Agency obligations, and government land have all been put out to the business sector. The cases that are exchanged through securitization are regularly arranged off without illuminating or acquiring assentation from the debt holder nation; and once responsibility for obligation is scattered it gets to be troublesome for the starting government to rebuild or cross out cases (Wilks, 2008).
Analysis of Facts
Understanding the reason of how the derivative instruments assumed their parts in realizing the 2007-2008 Icelandic financial crisis can't be over-emphasized. Accordingly it is essential to investigate the pertinent data encompassing the different parts played by these derivative instruments. This segment gives an investigation of the real actualities.
The Icelandic financial crisis has shown that expert financial investors not generally comprehend the dangers they face and the effect of the result. The respective way of this business sector, coupled with the abnormal state of fixation in the business sector as far as members makes it cloud to gatherings outside a specific exchange. In addition, as the cost decided in the derivatives markets may be utilized to figure the cost of different instruments, its darken nature may influence other business portions (European Commission, 2009). Amid a late assessment of certain exchanging positions, a considerable measure of abnormalities in derivatives instruments were found. For instance, there was an instance of a "sporadic" exchanging where a cash merchant has apparently lost 84 million pounds ($118.4 million) in FX wagers (Laurent, 2009). The subprime crisis came to fruition in extensive part in view of financial instruments, for example, securitization where banks would pool their different credits into sellable resources, consequently off-stacking unsafe advances onto others (Global Issues, 2008). For instance, some venture banks like Lehman Brothers got into home loans, purchasing them so as to securitize them and afterward offer them on. Rating offices were paid to rate these items (gambling an irreconcilable situation) and constantly got great evaluations, urging individuals to take them up. For all the derivatives that added to the worldwide financial crisis, the hidden resources, in a roundabout way or straightforwardly, were the land houses. These financial instruments furnished investors with influence high hazard and exceptional yield. At the point when the lodging air pocket blast, a lot of these derivative instruments lost qualities (since their qualities were subject to houses) leaving the financial foundations in enormous misfortunes (Qudrat, 2009). Numerous banks were assuming immense dangers expanding their introduction to issues; and speculation banks, not content with purchasing, offering and exchanging danger, got into home credits, contracts, and so forth without the right controls and administration (Global Issues, 2008).
While numerous researchers accuse defaulting home loans for the Icelandic financial crisis, it is just a part and manifestation of the more profound issue. (Murphy, 2008) explained the underlying driver of the crisis to mispricing in the huge Credit Default Swaps market. In view of this, (Murphy, 2008) brings up that the estimating of credit default swaps, whose essential sum has been evaluated to be $55 trillion by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and may really surpass $60 trillion (or more than 4 times the traded on an open market corporate and contract U.S. obligation they should protect), are completely unregulated, and have regularly been contracted via telephone without documentation. While trade exchanged derivatives leave a straightforward trail regarding positions, costs and exposures, data accessible to OTC market members and chiefs is constrained (European Commission, 2009).
Numerous experts have consequently faulted the part derivatives instruments have played in the Icelandic financial crisis on the lack of transparency. Anyhow Wilks (2008) declares that the issue is not lack of transparency of such instruments however their many-sided quality and the absence of controls utilized by purchasers and merchants. Because of this, Wilks (2008) prescribes treating derivatives like other financial instruments, expanding arraignments of financial cheats, enhancing exposure by moving from a standards based to a benchmarks based reporting structure, and guaranteeing that regulations don't present oligopoly control on watchmen, for example, appraisals offices or inspectors. Some contend that subjective human judgment opens up for the likelihood of undesirable human inclinations and control, and can prompt crisis. Neglecting to charge a deliberate danger premium on the credit default swaps exacerbated the issue of thinking little of normal default misfortunes that were connected without human judgment or business the ability to think (Murphy, 2008). Such under-valuing of credit default swaps brought about an acknowledge rise, as speculators had the capacity support their interests in bonds and credits with the protection of the credit default swaps to lessen their danger at anomalous low costs. Anyway as indicated by the (Global Issues, 2008), by summer 2008, the business sector for credit default swaps was gigantic, surpassing the whole world monetary yield of $50 trillion. The world's biggest protection and financial administrations organization, AIG alone had credit default swaps of around $400 billion around then, which had a considerable measure of introduction with minimal regulation. Moreover, a hefty portion of AIG's credit default swaps were on home loans, which obviously went downhill, thus did AIG (Global Issues, 2008).
Derivatives instruments are the key system in today's banking framework. While derivatives give the market's perspective on future improvements in business sector variables, they can result in destroying the whole financial business if not appropriately managed. Numerous financial examiners and economists have underscored the part that unreasonable risk taking through the utilization of derivative has played in the Icelandic financial crisis 2008. The high dangers taken by the different financial establishments in Iceland through issue of different derivative instruments were the prime explanation behind such crisis beginning with the breakdown of the housing business. The majority of these instruments were exchanged through the OTC markets which were inadequately managed.
A few specialists in the financial business have faulted the part derivatives instruments have played in the Icelandic financial crisis on subjective human judgment, absence of instrument's transparency, intricacy and the absence of controls utilized by purchasers and venders. While all these components are basic, the financial crisis could have been evaded if the commercial banks of Iceland adopted successful risk administration rehearses in their derivative exchanging. Overall, role of derivatives was severe in Iceland’s 2008 financial crises and can’t be neglected anyway.


Bomfim, A. N. (2001). Understanding Credit Derivatives and their Potential to Synthesize Riskless Assets. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
European Commission. (2009). Ensuring efficient, safe and sound derivatives markets. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
Forbes. (2013, 08 01). Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
Global Issues. (2008). Global Financial Crisis. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
Gorton, G., & & Metrick, A. (2010, 11 09). Securitized Banking and the Run on Repo. Retrieved from
IMF. (2011). Staff Reports on Iceland, 2010 and 2011. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
Jenkinson, N., Penalver, A., & Vause, N. (2008). Financial innovation: What have we learnt? Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
Kalele, J. (2011). Down from the heavens -Up from the ashes: The Finnish economic crisis of the 1990s in the light of economic and social research. Helsinki: Government Institute for Economic Research.
Laurent, L. (2009). Merrill Lynch Uncovers a 'Rogue' Trader.
Murphy, A. (2008). An Analysis of the Financial Crisis of 2008: Causes and Solutions. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
ÓLAFSSON, S. (2008). Íslenska efnahagsundrið–Frá hagsæld til frjalshyggju og fjármálahruns (The Icelandic Economic Miracle). STJÓRNMÁL OG STJÓRNSÝSLA, VOL. 4, NO. 2, 231-256.
ÓLAFSSON, S. (2011). Icelandic Capitalism –From Statism to Neoliberalismand Financial Collapse. Comparative Social Research (ed. L. Mjöset).
PIC. (2010). Parliamentary Investigation Committee into the Collapse of the Icelandic Banks. Alþingi, Reykjavík : Volumes 1-8. .
Qudrat, A. (2009). The Financial Express. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
Reavis, C. (2009). The Global Financial Crisis of 2008 – 2009: The Role of Greed, Fear and Oligarchs. MITSloan Management, 9(93), 1-22.
Schwarcz, S. L. (2009). Understanding the Subprime Financial Crisis. South Carolina Law Review, 60 (549).
Trading Economics. (2015). Retrieved 03 31, 2015, from
Trading Economics. (2015). Iceland House Price Index 2000-2015. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
Turner, A. (2009). The financial crisis and the future of financial regulation.
Wilks, A. (2008). Dangerous derivatives at the heart of the financial crisis. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
Yahoo Finance. (2012, 09 17). 2008 Financial Crisis Cost Americans $12.8 Trillion: Report. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
Yahoo Finance. (2013). Risky financial crisis derivatives return. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
Yahoo Finance. (2015). Key lesson from Iceland crisis is 'let banks fail'. Retrieved 03 31, 2015, from

Are you SEARCHING for SOLUTION(S) of this assignment or similar to this?

Our professional writers are available 24/7 we offer:
+ Lowest price then other online writing services.
+ Zero% plagiarism at all.
+ Free Harvard Style Referencing.
+ Free amendments in your work for unlimited number of times.
+ Pay only after your order is accepted.
+ Secured payment methods (Skrill, Bank Transfer, Western Union).


We Cares About Your Privacy

We use precise cookies and geolocation data to store and access information on a device and to provide personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development.

Privacy Policy