.png)
Introduction
Iceland's crisis
that set in
after the dynamite
breakdown of the
nation's banking framework
in October 2008 was surely a profound and troublesome crisis. It came in
the wake of a build-up of what has been
portrayed as the
biggest bubble economy
in the history, in
connection to the
size of the
national economy.
The money related breakdown was appropriately likewise of chronicled extents, given the extent of the three primary banks that were at the middle of the entire adventure. The fall of money markets file from its stature was more extreme and quicker than the breakdown on Wall Street in 1929-32 and the obligation collection related to the air pocket was outstandingly vast (ÓLAFSSON, 2011).
The money related breakdown was appropriately likewise of chronicled extents, given the extent of the three primary banks that were at the middle of the entire adventure. The fall of money markets file from its stature was more extreme and quicker than the breakdown on Wall Street in 1929-32 and the obligation collection related to the air pocket was outstandingly vast (ÓLAFSSON, 2011).
Figure 1: ICELAND’s GDP 2006-2012
------------------------------
Source:
(Trading Economics, 2015)
Figure
1 shows a major decrease in Iceland’s GDP started in 2008. Iceland's 2007 GDP
was 1.293 trillion krónur (€8.5 billion). In 2008, each of the three of the nation's
significant banks collapsed in taking after their troubles in refinancing their
short-term debt and a run on deposits in the United Kingdom. At more than 75%
of its GDP, Iceland's banking breakdown is the biggest endured by any nation in
monetary history in respect to the span of its economy.
In
late September 2008, it was declared that the Glitnir bank would be
nationalized. Right away from that point, Landsbanki and Glitnir were given
over to beneficiaries named by the Icelandic Financial Supervisory Authority
took after promptly via Iceland's biggest bank, Kaupthing (Yahoo Finance, 2015). Iceland's external debt was 9.553 trillion
Icelandic krónur (€50 billion) in mid-2008, more than 80% of which was held by
the saving accounts segment. The advantages of the three banks taken under the
control of the FME totalled 14.437 trillion krónur toward the end of the second
quarter 2008, just about 10 times the GDP of the of their country.
The
crisis was in the meantime a banking crisis, a currency crisis (the estimation
of the Icelandic Krona descended by around half of its value), a financial
subsidence and a crisis of legislative issues and societal trust. So it was an
intense setback for the economy and society. In the period from 1995 and up to
the breakdown neoliberal strategy accentuation had been dominating in Iceland,
with becoming stronger amid the 2000s. This included an extremely solid trust
in the force of business sectors, including financial markets, to self-manage
their operations and convey development. A
part of the
winning ethos was
a solid measurement
of laissez faire
and the private
division was progressively seen
as having points of interest over
the open segment
as a supplier and
guardian of administrations and to some
degree administration. Tax cuts,
privatization and business intensity got to be need objectives. These were
rather compelling advancements for a Nordic welfare state. Iceland's entrance
into the European
Economic Area Zone
(EEA) in 1995
presented the four opportunities of the European Union into
the Icelandic political economy, with full opportunity for the stream of
capital crosswise over outskirts being the most novel and considerable viewpoint.
That was a vital change of political economy environment. The privatization
of the fundamental
state banks, which
was begun in 1998,
demonstrated to be
a major turning
point in terms
of budgetary operations in
Iceland. At the point when the banks were completely privatized, toward
the start of 2003, the new managers transformed them on the spot into forceful
venture banks. They incredibly expanded their support in utilized mergers and
acquisitions, first inside
Iceland however then to
a more prominent degree
in the neighbouring nations. Outer obligation
raised and unreasonable
hazard conduct got to be
prevalent in the
Icelandic monetary and business
environment, driven by
the journey for
aggregation of resources,
benefits and rewards (PIC, 2010).
With the
simple stream of
obtained remote capital,
at low interest
rates, the economy
had sufficient assets for
fast development, which
soon transformed into
an intemperate hypothesis
bubble (Kalele, 2011). Already by end of
2004 Iceland had turned into the
world's most vigorously
obligated economy, measured
as gross outer
obligation in %
of GDP. Prior to the breakdown of
the banks in October 2008 the outside obligation had developed to around eight
times the span of the nation's GDP, a high-chance circumstance and completely
unsustainable once the development was backed off (ÓLAFSSON S. , 2008). IMF and
others have guaranteed
that Iceland's monetary crisis
will be the most
excessive one in
history, in connection to
GDP (IMF, 2011).
Besides, if the
collapse of the three
business banks were taken
as one element
the banks would be considered as the third
biggest bankruptcy in
the US history
of bankruptcies. Given that Iceland
has a populace
of just 0.1%
of the US
populace the relative size of the
breakdown is obviously tremendous (Halldoersson & Zoega, 2010). Hence, identifying
roles of various economic indicators (i.e. stock market, derivatives,
commodities, and currency exchange rate etc.) is essential to save economies
from such type of crisis in future. In this study, we are going to evaluate
role of derivatives in Icelandic Financial crisis.
Risk of Derivatives
A
derivative is a financial contract "an arrangement" used to guarantee
or anticipate the benefit of something. One individual is a derivative
purchaser and one individual is a derivative seller (Management
Study Guide, 2015).
Normally a financial organization, in the same way as a stock hedging or a
bank, goes into a derivative contract with another financial establishment.
Derivative purchasers pays a month to month charge to the derivative seller for
a set measure of time. For instance, let's say a pension fund is invested into
home loan upheld securities as a venture for its resigned people. It doesn't
need its beneficiaries to lose cash, so it pays the bank or hedge fund $500 a
month for 9 months to verify that the home loan sponsored security doesn't lose
esteem. On the off chance that the home loan upheld securities lose esteem, the
derivative seller consents to pay the benefits reserve $250,000. This sort of
derivative is known as a credit default swap.
Additionally,
a few banks, multifaceted investments and people wager on a stock's defeat.
They purchase an agreement to short a stock. Also, a monthly expense is paid to
a derivative dealer for a set measure of time. For instance, if an individual
accepts that gold will go underneath $1,600 an ounce in six months’ time, he or
she will purchase a derivative contract making a wager with someone else, bank,
or fence stock investments. The purchaser pays the dealer $4,200 a month and
consents to pay it for six months with trusts that gold will go underneath
$1,600 an ounce. Also, the dealer consents to that and guarantees that he will
pay the purchaser $300,000 if the cost of gold goes underneath $1,600 an ounce.
Unmistakably, the dealer doesn't accept that the cost of gold will fall beneath
$1,600 an ounce. At times, the merchant gathers the $4,200 a month and doesn't
even have the $300,000 in the occasion the gold value falls! That is known as
naked short selling which causes massive banking losses.
Derivatives Exchanged during 2007-08
Icelandic’s Financial Emergency
Some
derivative instruments were exchanged on the capital business sector amid the
2007-2008 financial emergency Iceland. These incorporate resource sponsored
securities, mortgaged supported securities, collaterized obligation
commitments, credit default swaps, forward, futures and options. Resource
supported securities are the most fundamental manifestations of financial
derivatives which give the spine to a significant part of the complex
derivative instruments (Yahoo Finance, 2013). A benefit sponsored
security alludes to any kind of obligation security which is supported by a
pool of advantages, their cash flow producing capacity. A home loan supported
security is a benefit sponsored security whose money streams are upheld by the
important and premium instalments of an arrangement of home loan credits.
Derivatives
brokers have additionally created collateralized obligation commitments through
which a financial foundation consolidates resources of different sorts (for
instance, prime contracts with subprime ones) (Yahoo Finance, 2013). The bundled
obligation is then sold to an exceptional reason vehicle, generally enrolled
seaward in a low impose purview. The new element then issues its own particular
value or bonds to exchange the obligation to different financial specialists,
cutting it up into distinctive tranches with diverse danger appraisals
utilizing complex scientific models (Wilks, 2008).
In a credit default swap bargain, the purchaser makes occasional instalments to
the merchant in return for the privilege to a result if there is a default or
credit compose down in admiration of a home loan or other obligation securities
they hold (Wilks, 2008).
CDSs are basically credit derivatives where the hidden resource is an advance,
contract or some other type of credit. Credit derivatives are financial
contracts that permit the exchange of credit danger starting with one business
member then onto the next, possibly encouraging more noteworthy productivity in
the valuing and dissemination of credit danger among financial business sector
members (Bomfim, 2001). A forward is an agreement whereby two
gatherings consent to trade the fundamental resource at a foreordained point in
time later on at settled value (European Commission, 2009). Thusly, the
purchaser concurs today to purchase a certain advantage later on and the
merchant consents to convey that benefit by then. Fates are institutionalized
advances exchanged on-trade. An alternative is an agreement that gives the
purchaser the privilege, yet not the commitment, to purchase (call) or offer
(put) the fundamental resource at or inside a certain point in time in the
fates at a foreordained value (strike cost) against the instalment of a
premium, which speak to the greatest misfortune for the purchaser of a choice (European Commission, 2009).
Securitization in Icelandic Financial Crisis
Understanding what happened, how and why the
Icelandic financial emergency came to fruition is vital for determining what
part derivative instruments played in that crisis. Since 1974, 3 bank crisis
had happened in Iceland, each played it significant role and each shared
something in common: a time of extraordinary financial liberalization and
flourishing that went before the crisis (Reavis, 2009). On account of this, (Reavis, 2009) states that financial emergencies may
be an unavoidable part of cutting edge private enterprise, an outcome of the
co-operations between hardwired human conduct and the liberated capacity to
improve, contend and evolve. The financial framework got to be so crowded' as
far as the strange measures of capital conveyed in every corner of each
investable business that the general liquidity of those businesses declined
radically. The Icelandic financial emergency came about because of a course of
disappointments, at first activated by the verifiably unanticipated profundity
of the fall in lodging costs. Numerous contend that the financial emergency
that started in August 2007 was a ―systemic occasion, in which the keeping
money area got to be indebted, as in it couldn't pay off its debt (Gorton & & Metrick, 2010). Some economist
accepted that the 2007-2008 financial emergency in Iceland was brought on by
intense elites (i.e. Banking oligarchy) that overextended in great times and
went for broke by making ever-bigger bets, with the understood sponsorship of
the administration, until the inexorable breakdown (Reavis, 2009).
Figure 2: Iceland Housing Price Index vs. Disposible Personal
Income 2001 - 2012
----------------------
Source: (Trading
Economics, 2015)
Commercial/business banks of Iceland along these
lines gave credits at sub-prime (rate well over the reference premium rate
charged by the banks) to the regular individuals for lodging purposes. These
advances were moved down against the houses - subprime home loan credits.
Subprime home loans are home loan advances issued to people who don't meet the
standard prerequisites for routine home loans. This may be because of poor
record as a consumer, insecure pay history, or some other element influencing
the income creating capacity of the individual (Qudrat, 2009). Preceding the financial emergency,
banks made home loan advances accessible to try and dangerous borrowers and
charged high premium rates to counterbalance misfortunes. Notwithstanding, when
home costs quit admiring, these borrowers couldn't refinance; hence, they
defaulted (Schwarcz, 2009). In 2006 the normal home cost about
four times what the normal family made. Despite the fact that family unit
earnings stayed level amid that time (figure 2) more individuals had the
capacity bear the cost of houses because of a facilitating of loaning
necessities (Reavis, 2009).
By 2007 it got to be obvious that the lodging air
pocket was beginning to blast and individuals started defaulting on their home
loans, sending a gradually expanding influence through the financial framework (Reavis, 2009). (Schwarcz, 2009) found that these defaults have brought
on significant measures of low speculation evaluation home loan upheld
securities to default and AAA-appraised securities to be downsized.
Discussion
of facts
Derivatives
played an important role in Icelandic financial crisis. The total notional value, or face value, of the global
derivatives market when the housing bubble popped in 2007 stood at around $500
trillion (Forbes, 2013). This area talks about a few truths in
relations to the 2007-2008 financial crisis. It concentrates on the parts
played by derivative instruments in the financial crisis.
Derivatives didn't result in the financial
emergency however they accelerated it once the subprime home loan fallen, due
to the interlinked ventures (Global Issues, 2008). There were two
parts that derivative instruments played in the Icelandic financial crisis (Turner, 2009). The principal is
shared funds (which are not banks), taking purchaser ventures which are fluid
in nature (prompt or short reclamation) and putting resources into long haul
securities. The second is mutual funds that are directed as resource
administrators, however the real lawful trust is normally enrolled seaward and
not subject to reasonable regulation. Derivatives permitted cash to stream all
the more openly from the individuals who had it to the individuals who required
it. Additionally, offering assurance against the danger of financial
misfortune, they offered ―fair comes back to high-dollar speculators willing to
go out on a limb.
For banks that advanced out several billions of
dollars, derivatives, hypothetically, helped relieve chance by securing them in
the event that advances were defaulted. The worldwide derivatives business
sector extended just about half amid 2007, with CDS market and options markets
developing exponentially (see figure 3). The remarkable estimation of CDS
contracts surged to more than five times the exceptional central of worldwide
corporate securities before the end of 2007 (Yahoo Finance, 2012), whilst the
extraordinary estimation of merchandise derivatives ascended from around US$400
billion in 1998 to US$9 trillion toward the end of 2007. Options markets have
likewise become firmly. Case in point, the extraordinary essential of interest
rate options had expanded from US$8 trillion in 1998 to US$57 trillion in 2007 (Jenkinson, Penalver, & Vause, 2008).
Figure 3: Outstanding notional amounts of derivatives
----------------
Source: (Jenkinson, Penalver, & Vause, 2008)
The dangers inalienable in Credit Default Swaps
(CDS) and different sorts of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives assumed pivotal
part in the Icelandic financial crisis (European Commission, 2009). OTC markets
were genuinely light administrative treatment markers for expert financial
specialists, which were not specifically available to the overall population.
These qualities ended up being the bedrock of the OTC business sector amid the
financial crisis and may have, truant brief and powerful mediation from
governments, destroyed devastation to the financial framework.
EU governments have turned to derivatives and
securitization as a method for expelling obligation from general society
accounts and of raising capital without expanding their authority obligation
load (Wilks, 2008).
Annuity instalments for previous state representatives, Export Credit Agency
obligations, and government land have all been put out to the business sector.
The cases that are exchanged through securitization are regularly arranged off
without illuminating or acquiring assentation from the debt holder nation; and
once responsibility for obligation is scattered it gets to be troublesome for
the starting government to rebuild or cross out cases (Wilks, 2008).
Analysis of
Facts
Understanding
the reason of how the derivative instruments assumed their parts in realizing
the 2007-2008 Icelandic financial crisis can't be over-emphasized. Accordingly
it is essential to investigate the pertinent data encompassing the different
parts played by these derivative instruments. This segment gives an
investigation of the real actualities.
The
Icelandic financial crisis has shown that expert financial investors not
generally comprehend the dangers they face and the effect of the result. The respective
way of this business sector, coupled with the abnormal state of fixation in the
business sector as far as members makes it cloud to gatherings outside a
specific exchange. In addition, as the cost decided in the derivatives markets
may be utilized to figure the cost of different instruments, its darken nature
may influence other business portions (European Commission, 2009). Amid a late
assessment of certain exchanging positions, a considerable measure of
abnormalities in derivatives instruments were found. For instance, there was an
instance of a "sporadic" exchanging where a cash merchant has
apparently lost 84 million pounds ($118.4 million) in FX wagers (Laurent, 2009). The subprime crisis
came to fruition in extensive part in view of financial instruments, for
example, securitization where banks would pool their different credits into
sellable resources, consequently off-stacking unsafe advances onto others (Global Issues, 2008). For instance, some
venture banks like Lehman Brothers got into home loans, purchasing them so as
to securitize them and afterward offer them on. Rating offices were paid to
rate these items (gambling an irreconcilable situation) and constantly got
great evaluations, urging individuals to take them up. For all the derivatives
that added to the worldwide financial crisis, the hidden resources, in a
roundabout way or straightforwardly, were the land houses. These financial
instruments furnished investors with influence high hazard and exceptional
yield. At the point when the lodging air pocket blast, a lot of these
derivative instruments lost qualities (since their qualities were subject to
houses) leaving the financial foundations in enormous misfortunes (Qudrat, 2009). Numerous banks were
assuming immense dangers expanding their introduction to issues; and
speculation banks, not content with purchasing, offering and exchanging danger,
got into home credits, contracts, and so forth without the right controls and
administration (Global Issues, 2008).
While
numerous researchers accuse defaulting home loans for the Icelandic financial
crisis, it is just a part and manifestation of the more profound issue. (Murphy, 2008) explained the
underlying driver of the crisis to mispricing in the huge Credit Default Swaps
market. In view of this, (Murphy, 2008) brings up that the estimating of credit
default swaps, whose essential sum has been evaluated to be $55 trillion by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and may really surpass $60 trillion
(or more than 4 times the traded on an open market corporate and contract U.S.
obligation they should protect), are completely unregulated, and have regularly
been contracted via telephone without documentation. While trade exchanged
derivatives leave a straightforward trail regarding positions, costs and exposures,
data accessible to OTC market members and chiefs is constrained (European Commission, 2009).
Numerous
experts have consequently faulted the part derivatives instruments have played
in the Icelandic financial crisis on the lack of transparency. Anyhow Wilks
(2008) declares that the issue is not lack of transparency of such instruments
however their many-sided quality and the absence of controls utilized by
purchasers and merchants. Because of this, Wilks (2008) prescribes treating
derivatives like other financial instruments, expanding arraignments of
financial cheats, enhancing exposure by moving from a standards based to a
benchmarks based reporting structure, and guaranteeing that regulations don't
present oligopoly control on watchmen, for example, appraisals offices or
inspectors. Some contend that subjective human judgment opens up for the
likelihood of undesirable human inclinations and control, and can prompt
crisis. Neglecting to charge a deliberate danger premium on the credit default
swaps exacerbated the issue of thinking little of normal default misfortunes
that were connected without human judgment or business the ability to think (Murphy, 2008). Such under-valuing
of credit default swaps brought about an acknowledge rise, as speculators had
the capacity support their interests in bonds and credits with the protection
of the credit default swaps to lessen their danger at anomalous low costs.
Anyway as indicated by the (Global Issues, 2008), by summer 2008, the
business sector for credit default swaps was gigantic, surpassing the whole
world monetary yield of $50 trillion. The world's biggest protection and
financial administrations organization, AIG alone had credit default swaps of
around $400 billion around then, which had a considerable measure of
introduction with minimal regulation. Moreover, a hefty portion of AIG's credit
default swaps were on home loans, which obviously went downhill, thus did AIG (Global Issues, 2008).
Conclusion
Derivatives
instruments are the key system in today's banking framework. While derivatives
give the market's perspective on future improvements in business sector
variables, they can result in destroying the whole financial business if not
appropriately managed. Numerous financial examiners and economists have
underscored the part that unreasonable risk taking through the utilization of
derivative has played in the Icelandic financial crisis 2008. The high dangers
taken by the different financial establishments in Iceland through issue of
different derivative instruments were the prime explanation behind such crisis
beginning with the breakdown of the housing business. The majority of these instruments
were exchanged through the OTC markets which were inadequately managed.
A few
specialists in the financial business have faulted the part derivatives
instruments have played in the Icelandic financial crisis on subjective human
judgment, absence of instrument's transparency, intricacy and the absence of
controls utilized by purchasers and venders. While all these components are
basic, the financial crisis could have been evaded if the commercial banks of
Iceland adopted successful risk administration rehearses in their derivative
exchanging. Overall, role of derivatives was severe in Iceland’s 2008 financial
crises and can’t be neglected anyway.
References
Bomfim, A. N. (2001). Understanding
Credit Derivatives and their Potential to Synthesize Riskless Assets.
Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2001/200150/200150pap.pdf
European Commission. (2009).
Ensuring efficient, safe and sound derivatives markets. Retrieved 04
01, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/financial-markets/docs/derivatives/report_en.pdf
Forbes. (2013, 08 01).
Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2013/01/08/five-years-after-the-financial-meltdown-the-water-is-still-full-of-big-sharks/
Global Issues. (2008). Global
Financial Crisis. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
http://www.globalissues.org/article/768/global-financial-crisis
Gorton, G., & &
Metrick, A. (2010, 11 09). Securitized Banking and the Run on Repo.
Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X1100081X
Halldoersson, O. G., &
Zoega, G. (2010). ICELAND’S FINANCIAL CRISIS IN AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE.
UNIVERSITY OFICELAND. INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, WORKING PAPER SERIES
NO. W10:02.
IMF. (2011). Staff
Reports on Iceland, 2010 and 2011. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
http://www.imf.org
Jenkinson, N., Penalver, A.,
& Vause, N. (2008). Financial innovation: What have we learnt?
Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from www.bis.org/review/r080724e.pdf
Kalele, J. (2011). Down from
the heavens -Up from the ashes: The Finnish economic crisis of the 1990s in
the light of economic and social research. Helsinki: Government Institute
for Economic Research.
Laurent, L. (2009). Merrill
Lynch Uncovers a 'Rogue' Trader.
Murphy, A. (2008). An
Analysis of the Financial Crisis of 2008: Causes and Solutions. Retrieved
04 01, 2015, from www2.oakland.edu/oujournal/files/17_financial_crises.pdf
ÓLAFSSON, S. (2008).
Íslenska efnahagsundrið–Frá hagsæld til frjalshyggju og fjármálahruns (The
Icelandic Economic Miracle). STJÓRNMÁL OG STJÓRNSÝSLA, VOL. 4, NO. 2,
231-256.
ÓLAFSSON, S. (2011).
Icelandic Capitalism –From Statism to Neoliberalismand Financial Collapse. Comparative
Social Research (ed. L. Mjöset).
PIC. (2010). Parliamentary
Investigation Committee into the Collapse of the Icelandic Banks.
Alþingi, Reykjavík : Volumes 1-8. .
Qudrat, A. (2009). The
Financial Express. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
http://www.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2009/01/02/54822.html.
Reavis, C. (2009). The
Global Financial Crisis of 2008 – 2009: The Role of Greed, Fear and
Oligarchs. MITSloan Management, 9(93), 1-22.
Schwarcz, S. L. (2009).
Understanding the Subprime Financial Crisis. South Carolina Law Review, 60
(549).
Trading Economics. (2015).
Retrieved 03 31, 2015, from http://www.tradingeconomics.com/iceland/gdp
Trading Economics. (2015). Iceland
House Price Index 2000-2015. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/iceland/housing-index
Turner, A. (2009). The
financial crisis and the future of financial regulation.
Wilks, A. (2008). Dangerous
derivatives at the heart of the financial crisis. Retrieved 04 01, 2015,
from http://www.eurodad.org/whatsnew/articles.aspx?id=3024.
Yahoo Finance. (2012, 09
17). 2008 Financial Crisis Cost Americans $12.8 Trillion: Report.
Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/2008-financial-crisis-cost-americans-12-8-trillion-145432501.html
Yahoo Finance. (2013). Risky
financial crisis derivatives return. Retrieved 04 01, 2015, from
https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/risky-financial-crisis-derivatives-return-010209683.html
Yahoo Finance. (2015). Key
lesson from Iceland crisis is 'let banks fail'. Retrieved 03 31, 2015,
from
https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/key-lesson-iceland-crisis-let-023854916.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you SEARCHING for SOLUTION(S) of this assignment or similar to this?
Our professional writers are available 24/7 we offer:
+ Lowest price then other online writing services.
+ Zero% plagiarism at all.
+ Free Harvard Style Referencing.
+ Free amendments in your work for unlimited number of times.
+ Pay only after your order is accepted.
+ Secured payment methods (Skrill, Bank Transfer, Western Union).
+ Zero% plagiarism at all.
+ Free Harvard Style Referencing.
+ Free amendments in your work for unlimited number of times.
+ Pay only after your order is accepted.
+ Secured payment methods (Skrill, Bank Transfer, Western Union).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------